MBITS delivers end-to-end VMware to Proxmox migrations designed to reduce licensing costs while maintaining performance, security and uptime.
Changes to VMware licensing and cost structures have forced many organisations to reassess their virtualisation strategy.
Proxmox VE has emerged as a viable, enterprise-ready alternative. Migrating production workloads, however, requires experience, planning and precision.
MBITS delivers end-to-end VMware to Proxmox migrations designed to reduce licensing costs while maintaining performance, security and uptime.
For many organisations, the Broadcom acquisition of VMware changed the economics of virtualisation overnight. Licensing models shifted. Costs increased significantly. Organisations that had built their infrastructure around VMware found themselves with limited options and mounting pressure to act.
The risk is not just financial. A poorly planned migration can introduce downtime, security gaps and operational instability that outlast the cost savings it was meant to deliver.
For organisations seeking predictable costs and long-term platform stability, Proxmox is a future-ready alternative that does not trade capability for affordability.
We apply a structured migration framework designed to minimise risk and reduce downtime. Every phase is sequenced to protect operational continuity and deliver a platform that is production-ready from day one.
We ensure internal teams are prepared to operate the new platform through clear documentation, operational runbooks and optional Proxmox training.
Built for organisations that need seeking control and certainty.
Virtualisation migrations are high-impact initiatives. The difference between a smooth transition and a disruptive one comes down to experience, planning and the discipline to execute without shortcuts.
MBITS brings deep, hands-on expertise across both VMware and Proxmox environments. Issues are anticipated, managed and resolved before they affect operations.
Talk to us about your VMware exit strategy.
Each agent compares the current patch list against what is actually installed on its device. Any gap between what has been released and what is deployed is immediately surfaced. Critically, Introspectus pays particular attention to the timing of patch deployment not just whether a patch is present, but when it was applied.
This temporal dimension is central to Essential Eight compliance, where the difference between a patch applied on day two versus day thirty can mean the difference between maturity levels, and between an environment that was protected and one that was exposed.
This combination of daily patch intelligence, severity-based filtering, agent-level validation, and deployment timing analysis gives organisations a real-time, evidence-based view of their operating system patch posture mapped directly to the ISM controls applicable to the Essential Eight patch operating systems strategy.
The visibility gap here is particularly consequential. A patch may be approved and scheduled, yet never successfully applied due to a failed deployment, a device that was offline during the maintenance window, a reboot that was deferred, or a system that exists outside managed channels entirely.
Organisations that rely solely on deployment tooling to confirm patch status are measuring intent, not reality. The ACSC is explicit on this point: organisations need to confirm patches have been applied successfully, not merely that they were dispatched.
Within the Essential Eight framework, patching operating systems is a core and non-negotiable control. The ACSC sets clear expectations: patches for internet-facing infrastructure must be applied within 48 hours when identified as critical or where working exploits exist, and within two weeks for standard releases.
Patches for workstations, servers, and network devices must be applied within one month, with tighter timeframes applying in high-threat environments. Critically, the ACSC also mandates that vulnerability scanning occurs at least daily for internet-facing systems and at least fortnightly for workstations and non-internet-facing infrastructure not to replace patching, but to confirm it has actually occurred.
From this inventory, Introspectus performs targeted web intelligence gathering. For each application identified, the platform locates the top five authoritative sources of patch and release information vendor security advisories, release notes, and vulnerability databases and retrieves that content into a central repository.
Aletheia, Introspectus’s AI analysis agent, then reads and analyses this content to extract the intelligence that matters for application patching: the latest available version, whether a release addresses a security vulnerability, the severity of that vulnerability, and all information relevant to the Essential Eight application patching requirements. This structured intelligence is mapped directly to the applicable ISM controls, producing defensible, audit-ready evidence of an organisation’s application patch compliance posture.
A critical and frequently overlooked problem is the visibility gap. Organisations may believe their applications are current when, in reality, patches have silently failed, devices have missed deployment windows, or software has been installed outside of managed channels entirely.
Without continuous inspection at the endpoint level, these gaps go undetected until an audit or, worse, a breach.
Within the Essential Eight standard, patching applications is a dedicated and non-negotiable control. The ACSC specifies clear timeframes: critical vulnerabilities in internet-facing services must be addressed within 48 hours, commonly used applications such as office productivity suites, web browsers, email clients and PDF software must be patched within two weeks of release, and all other applications within one month.
For organisations in high-threat environments, the bar is higher still. Meeting these requirements consistently across hundreds of distinct applications deployed across thousands of endpoints is not achievable through manual effort alone.
